Friday, December 4, 2009

Artists for Movement

The United States is known as a melting pot nation: with a slew of ethnicities, religions, and ideologies blended together to form one diversely unified nation. No one person originated from this land, as our founding fathers migrated to the coasts of the East Coast from Great Britain. For these reason the subject of immigration hits home to many of us. Personally, as a child of two Mexican immigrants, it is a subject met with personal accounts and sympathies for those who tread arduous journeys to reach America, which many see as the “land of dreams”. In his/ her article “Border Hacks: Electronic Civil Disobedience and the Politics of Immigration”, Raley discusses political power in art and media that allow voices of opposition to be heard, despite the quieting by the slanted, political main stream culture. More importantly does Raley emphasize individual power in forming resistance to positions we do not agree with are simply unjust.
With a massive number of “3,500 people [who] are reported dead attempting to cross the United States” (3), it is evident that something must be done with the way the U.S.-Mexico border is dealt with. Although these individuals are attempting to enter this country, their consequences for their actions are not equivalent to the consequence they are given, death. Raley continues to explain that “Minutemen claim the right to make sovereign decisions about friend and enemy” (8). Minutemen are in general right-winged Americans strongly against the ideas of foreigners entering our country, and although this may not encompass the nation’s beliefs, the still hold the power to catch and return people back to their home country. These individuals grasp someone else’s life in their hands – whether or not they achieve their goal of reaching a land where they’re potential matches the opportunities provided, or whether they return to a life of scrounging for jobs at the local tienda(store). Our nation and culture continuously refers to these struggling individuals as ‘Others’ or ‘Aliens’ which in turn deems them “neither alive nor dead, but interminably spectral” (10). As a result, American citizens dismiss the migrants’ human characteristics and lump them together as a bounded society – without looking more in depth into their various experiences that each one of them has. Therefore the “war against terrorism is a war without end will be one that justifies itself endlessly in relation to the spectral infinity of its enemy” (10). As the political continues to dehumanize immigrants and impersonalize their efforts, a resistance by American society will persist because it is as if they are fighting nothing—just another meaningless face of the many.
In order for the whispers of the opposition to become more audible, forms of art and media allow for widespread coverage and personalization. Trebor Scholz and Carol Flax’s hypermedia project, Tuesday Afternoon, “contrasts issue of individually experienced border control” (19) by superimposing a map of the U.S.-Mexico border with a QuickTime video of someone walking along the border, short stories are presented in hypertexual form—from a woman being denied entry to a country after displaying her faulty travel visas, to a women given thirty days to leave the country after her marriage of convenience is nullified. It also estimates where people have fallen to death along the border. All of these accounts allow the large population an opportunity to open their eyes to personal accounts of the dismay and pain that may come along with being denied access to a country. It is not merely a trip back to where you came from, rather it is a shattering of hopes and plans that are extensively made; it is a more comfortable life denied, it is a denial of harnessing one’s potential. In art demonstrations such as this, first person accounts are presented in a way where those not familiar with this kind of exertion can see the disappointment in a migrants face, feel the moment of rejection, and make opinions of their own as to the raw nature of immigrating. This art form encourages “freedom of movement” (18) in that all the hardships would be solved if people were allowed the mere freedom of going where one chooses. It is the “revenge of nomadism over the principle of territory” (23). This idea is a large idea, in that has grand possibilities to it. Why create divisions among the global community? It is a form of separation between races, classes, and ideologies that perhaps creates feuds among nations as we seem to feel that we cannot relate to one another.
Continuing to individualize the process of crossing borders, the Border Film Project gave five hundred people disposable cameras Minutemen and migrants to record their experiences. With images such as migrants walking and Minutemen on the lookout for illegal citizens crossing the border, these images have a “memorializing capacity as well” (28). As the country creates a sense of invisibility for migrants, these photos create a sense of true reality because they are direct representations of the events that happen in life along the border.
It is essential to give separate identities to those people who are courageous enough to attempt to enter this country. Although they are not legally admitted here, they risk their lives and reputations in forging that extensive journey across the long, hazardous journey. By robbing them of their individuality, we rob them of respect as a human being. Would you consider my parents as one of the ‘Other’? As the faceless, bodiless, mindless? Just another immigrant? These art and media projects allow my mother and father to gain their defining features once again. They now become human.

6 comments:

  1. Amaris: Beautifully written post, and I'm glad you had a chance to read the Raley in more detail. When I have the time, I like to show my students a short film called "The Other Side" (by Bill Brown), as it demonstrates the kind of thoughtful and empathetic reflection we need to use in the case of the U.S.-Mexico border. Then there's always the classic statement of Chicana culture by Gloria Anzaldua, called Borderlands/La Frontera.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find this post pretty interesting and intriguing.

    First, this post reminds me of the outgroup homogeneity, a concept in psychology that states that people in a certain group find great variety in their group while people find that people outside of that certain group very similar to one another and bland. For example, being Asian American, I find that Asians are very diverse. I can certainly notice the differences among the Chinese people, Japanese people and Korean people. However, I cannot say the same thing about Europeans or Latinos. Germans and Russians seem very similar to me. Argentinians, Colombians, Peruvians all seem similar to me. This perception is very unfortunate, and I think that it arises from the fact that we simply spend more time with the people of our ethnicity. Society somehow encourages that, so that's why there are still social cliques today. I do find that this perception needs to change. It would be great if Americans could see Mexicans not as a blob of people, but as people with variety and a unique tradition that will enhance American culture. If the outgroup homogeneity perception changes, I think that racism and the border problems will be ameliorated.

    I also feel that Mexicans and other ethnic groups do have the right to migrate to America. The concept of "American Dream" do encourage people to come to America. The dream may consist of increased freedom, better education or better standard of living. People do have legitimate reasons to come to the USA. I also find it ironic that America often claims that it is the "land of the free" but has a history of abusing other races. Slavery is a good example of past racism. I believe that in order for America to keep its promise of being a free land, it needs to have more tolerance for other races.

    There is a point I want to make as well. I am not necessarily saying that America is doing a bad job of dealing with racism. The United States have come a long way since slavery existed. I am saying that more could be done though, and the border problem does show that there is room for improvement.

    Finally, I believe that the problem can be solved. I think that by allowing more Americans to interact with Mexicans, Americans can really appreciate their ethnicity and have more tolerance for them. Overall, there is the border problem, but we have come a long way in our society and the problem will not be too difficult to solve.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You know I had always been pretty ambivalent about the illegal immigration issues. Because on the one hand I saw how people could be angry about the fact that illegal immigrants are not legally part of the US community but on the other hand I saw why people wanted to cross the border. In the past few years I have come to realize that it shouldn't matter greatly how people get here. There are simply too many strings attached to the notion of "Land of Opportunity." People focus too much on things like paper work, but what does it all mean? It's simply a piece of paper that gives people access to a better life? Granted many things of importance are placed on paper, but how are those pieces of paper worth more than lives?

    You are correct, Amaris, about the fact that people do not put faces to things. Because if there is an expressive face placed on an issue, then people might begin to care. So the population chooses to view the immigrant population as negative statistics rather than people that have dreams and goals and are simply striving for them. So, yeah as Alenda said, very well written and I would have to agree with your perspective on immigration.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely agree with you Amaris. All too often people look at only the numbers and never do they put faces to those numbers. And I don't think that is the case with just this. I think our society has become one that only looks at the numbers rather than the personalities behind those numbers. I think a similar situation would be the one of getting into a college like Cal. We all submitted pieces of paper (or emailed) to describe ourselves in order to be admitted. And what does it get us? The opportunity to "make something of ourselves". Statistics show that those who have a college degree will make a lot more money over their lifetime than those who do not have one. So then what makes us better than those who did not get accepted? The fact that we were able to focus better in high school? It is a system that needs to be redone, just like the immigration system. Our society places too much value on numbers rather than personalities.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The article was a very interesting read and in all senses, you have responded to it in a very appropriate manner. You mention a lot of things. I would like to discuss one of the ideals you bring up: that this "alien" description needs to be removed. I think you are trying to say that Americans should stop seeing immigrants - be they legal or not - as a collective "blob" of people summarized under the term alien. I agree with you - there are many negative implications of doing something like this; even though, this is practiced throughout with differing groups of people and differing terms.
    Legally, an alien, even if they are a day away from receiving their citizenship is entitled to a different protection from the US government than is a citizen. Therefore, legally, I see a clear explanation for why immigrants are grouped.
    Socially, I agree, it creates a lot of problems. I believe that it is really easy to blame the majority of US Citizens, who don't/haven't had to deal with the department of homeland security and what not - for yes, in a certain sense they are ignorant. But I do believe that people effectively put themselves into groups to be described many times. Most times, as Anthony hinted on, people have no choice, depending on their background they are forced to be in a group - however that can be changed, only by the force of the person. What I am trying to say is that, socially, this term "alien" is applied to people who don't fit in the popular cultural paradigms. People who don't speak the language, follow different customs and comport themselves in a different manner. By, learning the customs, on can un-alienate them self, and become a non alien - socially.
    I know that when one of my friends immigrated to the US from India, he didn't speak any English etc. even my Indian friends were willing to classify him as an alien, even though, he was here on an immigrant visa (green card); however, now that he has began to fit in, no one really considers him an alien anymore - even though, legally, he still hasn't accepted his citizenship.
    So hopefully I have not managed to offend someone; but, I feel that people treat us differently on the way they perceive us. We can blame the people - but at the end of the day, it is easier to change yourself than to change the other person.
    Jaskaran Saggu

    ReplyDelete
  6. There has always been a gray area regarding stereotyping when labeling a group of people—especially in the context of Aliens. Aliens is a term given to people living in this country who are not citizen and exert influence on American society/culture without necessarily being bounded by the practices of that society or culture. As a consequence, there is a negative stereotype of Aliens although the influence of different cultures and ideals can be positive (considered with a humanitarian good). Illegal Aliens refers to people entering this country without going through official channels providing an influence in society/culture that may or may not actually be wanted. That is where the gray area is—should the well being of one group of people be allowed to affect the natural development of another group of people? I strongly believe that ideals and aspects of culture should never be forced on other people. However, many illegal aliens enter this country to escape poverty and create a better life for themselves. Why should a person be allowed to make a better living just because of what side of some invisible line they are born on? I have family who are immigrants from oversea and are very proud to be American citizens. So there is something to be said for the legal process, but they still seem to fit into this somewhat faceless label of immigrants who live in this country.
    It would be nice if we, as a people, could learn to stop judging people for their past and heritage and focus on who we are now.

    Kevin Campbell

    ReplyDelete