The author in “Border Hacks” differentiates between Web Activism and Hacking – which was classified as “information terrorism.” True, in some cases Web Activism can be harmless, and can be used to raise public awareness. But, as discussed in “Photoshop for Democracy,” activism, even in the form of parodies, photoshopped pictures, and other related “harmless” activities can cause great damage not only to political candidates but to larger groups as well. Some of these images are used as “terrorism” because, on the Internet, nothing and no one is really safe from un-filtered images, from controversial debated to outright lies. Just as Joseph Goebbels, a truly dark and sinister, but brilliant propaganda figure, once said, “a lie spoken a thousand times becomes the truth!” On the internet, just one YouTube video can become popular, “go viral,” as it is called. These will be copied not one thousand, not ten thousand, but hundreds of thousands of times, maybe even millions, as what happened to the now-famous Gary Brolsma video popularly called “The Numa Numa Guy.”
While a short clip of a teenager (Brolsma was 18 at the time) dancing to a Moldovan song may cause little alarm, the rate at which it spread across the internet (over 700 million views estimated by now, allegedly copied thousands of times to other websites) shows the power of the web to carry any information, including disinformation, inciting terror in the citizens of a nation, causing social disruption, and, possibly, rebellion.
One of the reasons for this is that people are basically willing to take what looks and sounds scary, frightening, out-of-bounds, and accept it as true. This is the same principle as that which dove hundreds of people to large-scale paranoia during the UFO-scares of the 50’s, thousands to protest everything from the Vietnam War to oppressive government control in the 60’s and 70’s, and still drives thousands of protestors today. Lies are easier to make attractive, they are, in a way, as Venus Flytraps to unsuspecting flies – they look very pretty, they are easily acceptable, no matter how illogical, and they are very often malicious on many levels.
Thus, Web Activism can and often is a very potent form of terrorism, especially in the societies where people easily believe in many things. One example is from 2008, when a YouTube user found a large number of black containers which reminded him of coffins and uploaded a somewhat long clip of walking around them and even inspecting one. A few weeks later, that very video became Russian News, with newscasters quite seriously claiming that America must be preparing for World War III, having allegedly made “millions of bio-degradable coffins.” News stories like this often appear in various Russian, European, and even U.S. publications, mostly about what happens in nations other than the one which published the paper. Thus, if one video was for a time a cause of serious dismay and un-comfort on a national level, then any political “activism” can be boosted to the level of a serious national security threat. And thus, should also be classified as potential information terrorism.